EM.Ferma - Revision history

Asabet: /* Variety of Physical Objects in EM.Ferma */

2021-01-11T16:59:38Z

‎Variety of Physical Objects in EM.Ferma

Kazem Sabet: /* Variety of Physical Objects in EM.Ferma */

2018-08-03T23:47:20Z

‎Variety of Physical Objects in EM.Ferma

Kazem Sabet: /* The 2D Quasi-Static Simulation Mode */

2018-07-18T13:42:57Z

‎The 2D Quasi-Static Simulation Mode

Kazem Sabet: /* Static Simulation Engine Settings */

2018-07-18T13:37:06Z

‎Static Simulation Engine Settings

Kazem Sabet: /* Running an Electrostatic, Magnetostatic or Thermal Analysis */

2018-07-18T13:32:52Z

‎Running an Electrostatic, Magnetostatic or Thermal Analysis

Kazem Sabet: /* Running an Electrostatic, Magnetostatic or Thermal Analysis */

2018-07-18T13:29:25Z

‎Running an Electrostatic, Magnetostatic or Thermal Analysis

Kazem Sabet: /* Running an Electrostatic, Magnetostatic or Thermal Analysis */

2018-07-18T13:26:55Z

‎Running an Electrostatic, Magnetostatic or Thermal Analysis

Kazem Sabet: /* Domain Boundary Conditions */

2018-07-18T13:24:23Z

‎Domain Boundary Conditions

Kazem Sabet: /* EM.Ferma as the Static Module of EM.Cube */

2018-07-17T12:34:02Z

‎EM.Ferma as the Static Module of EM.Cube

Kazem Sabet: /* EM.Ferma in a Nutshell */

2018-06-17T02:44:32Z

‎EM.Ferma in a Nutshell

@@ Line 209: / Line 209: @@
 | style="width:200px;" | [[Glossary of EM.Cube's Materials, Sources, Devices & Other Physical Object Types#Wire Current |Wire Current]]
 | style="width:300px;" | Modeling wire current sources
-| style="width:100px;" | line and polyline objects
+| style="width:100px;" | Line and polyline objects
 | style="width:250px;" | Acts as a magnetic source
 |-

@@ Line 229: / Line 229: @@
 | style="width:100px;" | Solid objects
 | style="width:250px;" | Acts as a thermal source (shares the same navigation tree node as volume charge)
 |}

@@ Line 554: / Line 554: @@
 EM.Ferma's electrostatic simulation engine features a 2D solution mode where your physical model is treated as a longitudinally infinite structure in the direction normal to specified "2D Solution Plane". A 2D solution plane is defined based on a "Field Sensor" definition that already exists in your project. To explore EM.Ferma's 2D mode, right-click on '''2D Solution Planes''' in the "Computational Domain" section of the navigation tree and select '''2D Domain Settings...''' from the contextual menu.  In the 2D Static Domain dialog, check the checkbox labeled "Reduce the 3D Domain to a 2D Solution Plane". The first field sensor observable in the navigation tree is used for the definition of the 2D solution plane.
-At the end of a 2D electrostatic analysis, you can view the electric field and potential results on the field sensor plane. It is assumed that your structure is invariant along the direction normal to the 2D solution plane. Therefore, your computed field and potential profiles must be valid at all the planes perpendicular to the specified longitudinal direction.
+At the end of a 2D electrostatic analysis, you can view the electric field and potential results on the field sensor plane. It is assumed that your structure is invariant along the direction normal to the 2D solution plane. Therefore, your computed field and potential profiles must be valid at all the planes perpendicular to the specified longitudinal direction. A 2D structure of this type can be considered to represent a transmission line of infinite length. EM.Ferma also performs a quasi-static analysis of the transmission line structure, and usually provides good results at lower microwave frequencies (f < 10GHz). It computes the characteristics impedance Z<sub>0</sub> and effective permittivity &epsilon;<sub>eff</sub> of the multi-conductor TEM or quasi-TEM transmission line. The results are written to two output data files named "solution_plane_Z0.DAT" and "solution_plane_EpsEff.DAT", respectively.
 <table>
@@ Line 562: / Line 562: @@
 </table>
-You can also use EM.Ferma to perform a quasi-static analysis of multi-conductor transmission line structures, which usually provides good results at lower microwave frequencies (f < 10GHz).
+[[Image:Info_icon.png|30px]] Click here to learn more about the theory of '''[[Electrostatic_%26_Magnetostatic_Field_Analysis#2D_Quasi-Static_Solution_of_TEM_Transmission_Line_Structures | 2D Quasi-Static Analysis of Transmission Lines]]'''.
 <table>
@@ Line 571: / Line 571: @@
 </tr>
 </table>
 <table>

@@ Line 538: / Line 538: @@
 ===Static Simulation Engine Settings===
-EM.Ferma currently uses a single iterative linear system solver based on the stabilized Bi-Conjugate Gradient (BiCG) method to solve the matrix equations which result from the discretization of Poisson's equation. You can specify some numerical parameters related to the Bi-CG solver. To do that, you need to open the Simulation Engine Settings Dialog by clicking the "Settings" button located next to the "Select Engine" drop-down list. From this dialog you can set the maximum number of BiCG iterations, which has a default value of 10,000. You can also set a value for "Convergence Error". The default value for electrostatic analysis is 0.001. For magnetostatic analysis, the specified value of convergence error is reduced by a factor 1000 automatically. Therefore, the default convergence error in this case is 1e-6.
+EM.Ferma offers two different types of linear system solver for solving the matrix equations that result from discretization of Poisson's equation: an iterative solver based on the stabilized Bi-Conjugate Gradient (BiCG) method and a Gauss-Seidel solver. The default solver type is BiCG. You can specify some numerical parameters related to the BiCG solver. To do that, you need to open the Simulation Engine Settings Dialog by clicking the "Settings" button located next to the "Select Engine" drop-down list. From this dialog you can set the maximum number of BiCG iterations, which has a default value of 10,000. You can also set a value for "Convergence Error". The default value for electrostatic analysis is 0.001. For magnetostatic analysis, the specified value of convergence error is reduced by a factor 1000 automatically. Therefore, the default convergence error in this case is 10<sup>-6</sup>.
 {{Note|The value of convergence error affect the accuracy of your simulation results. For most practical scenarios, the default values are adequate. You can reduce the convergence error for better accuracy at the expense of longer computation time.}}

@@ Line 532: / Line 532: @@
 </table>
-In EM.Ferma you don't have to choose between the electrostatic or magnetostatic simulation engines. The program looks at the types of sources and material objects present in your project workspace and then it determines whether an electrostatic analysis or a magnetostatic analysis or possibly both should be performed. When there are only electric sources present, you will get nonzero electric fields and zero magnetic fields. When there are only magnetic sources present, you will get nonzero magnetic fields and zero electric fields. On the other hand, since the electrostatic and thermal solvers share the same navigation resources, you can run only one of the two engines at a time. By default, the electrostatic solver is enabled. Switching to the thermal solver is done through the Boundary Conditions dialog by checking the box labeled '''Treat as a Thermal Structure'''.
+In EM.Ferma you don't have to choose between the electrostatic or magnetostatic simulation engines. The program looks at the types of sources and material objects present in your project workspace and then it determines whether an electrostatic analysis or a magnetostatic analysis or possibly both should be performed. When there are only electric sources present, you will get nonzero electric fields and zero magnetic fields. When there are only magnetic sources present, you will get nonzero magnetic fields and zero electric fields. On the other hand, since the electrostatic and thermal solvers share the same navigation resources, you can run only one of the two engines at a time. By default, the electrostatic solver is enabled.
 An "Analysis" is the simplest simulation mode of EM.Ferma. It is a single-shot finite difference solution of your static problem. The physical structure of your project workspace is first discretized using a fixed-cell mesh and the Poisson equation is solved numerically everywhere in the computational domain. The field and potential values at each mesh node are computed, and the specified observables are written into data files. The other available simulation modes, parametric sweep and optimization, involve multiple runs of the static solvers.

@@ Line 524: / Line 524: @@
 [[EM.Ferma]] has three independent but functionally similar static simulation engines: Electrostatic, Magnetostatic and Thermal. The electrostatic engine solves the electric form of Poisson's equation for electric scalar potential subject to electric field boundary conditions, in the presence of electric sources (volume charges and fixed-potential PEC blocks) and dielectric material media. The magnetostatic engine solves the magnetic form of Poisson's equation for magnetic vector potential subject to magnetic field boundary conditions, in the presence of magnetic sources (wire and volume currents and permanent magnetic blocks) and magnetic material media. The thermal engine solves the thermal form of Poisson's equation for steady-state temperature subject to thermal boundary conditions, in the presence of heat sources (volume sources and fixed-temperature PTC blocks) and insulator material media.
-To run a static simulation, first you have to open the Run Dialog. This is done by clicking the "Run" button of the Simulate Toolbar, or by selecting the "Run" item of the Simulate Menu, or simply using the keyboard shortcut "Ctrl+R". The only available simulation engine is "Static". Clicking the Run button of this dialog starts a static analysis. A separate window pops up which reports the progress of the current simulation.
+To run a static simulation, first you have to open the Run Dialog. This is done by clicking the "Run" button of the Simulate Toolbar, or by selecting the "Run" item of the Simulate Menu, or simply using the keyboard shortcut "Ctrl+R". There are two available options for the simulation engine: '''Electrostatic-Magnetostatic Solver''' and '''Steady-State Thermal Solver'''. Clicking the Run button of this dialog starts a static analysis. A separate window pops up which reports the progress of the current simulation.
 <table>

@@ Line 528: / Line 528: @@
 <table>
 <tr>
-<td> [[Image:Ferma L1 Fig11.png|thumb|left|480px|EM.Ferma's Simulation Run dialog.]] </td>
+<td> [[Image:Ferma L1 Fig11.png|thumb|left|600px|EM.Ferma's Simulation Run dialog.]] </td>
 </tr>
 </table>

@@ Line 302: / Line 302: @@
 *EM.Ferma provides two options for thermal boundary conditions on the domain box. The Dirichlet boundary condition is the default option and is specified as a fixed temperature value on the surface of the domain walls. By default, this value is 0&deg;C. The Neumann boundary condition specifies the normal derivative of the temperature on the surface of the domain walls. This is equivalent to a constant heat flux passing through the domain walls and its value is specified in W/m<sup>2</sup>. A zero heat flux means a perfectly insulated domain box and is known as the adiabatic boundary condition.
-To modify the boundary conditions, right-click on "Boundary Conditions" in the navigation tree, and select "Boundary Conditions..." from the contextual menu to open the Boundary Conditions Dialog. In order to switch from the electrostatic solver to the thermal solver you have to check the box labeled '''Treat as a Thermal Structure'''. In the "Global Thermal Properties" section of the Boundary Conditions dialog, you can set the values of the ambient temperature in &deg;C, thermal conductivity of the environment in W/(m.K) and the convective coefficient in W/(m<sup>2</sup>.K). You can also disable the enforcement of the convective boundary condition on the surface of solid insulator objects.
+To modify the boundary conditions, right-click on "Boundary Conditions" in the navigation tree, and select "Boundary Conditions..." from the contextual menu to open the Boundary Conditions Dialog. When you switch from the electrostatic-magnetostatic solver to the thermal solver in EM.Ferma's Run Simulation dialog, it automatically checks the box labeled '''Treat as a Thermal Structure''' in the Boundary Conditions dialog. Conversely, if you check this box in the Boundary Conditions dialog, the solver type is set to the thermal solver in the Simulation Run dialog. In the "Global Thermal Properties" section of the Boundary Conditions dialog, you can set the values of the ambient temperature in &deg;C, thermal conductivity of the environment in W/(m.K) and the convective coefficient in W/(m<sup>2</sup>.K). You can also disable the enforcement of the convective boundary condition on the surface of solid insulator objects.
-−
-{{Note|You have to use the boundary conditions dialog to switch between the electrostatic and thermal solvers.}}
 <table>

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 === EM.Ferma as the Static Module of EM.Cube ===
-[[EM.Ferma]] is the low-frequency '''Static Module''' of '''[[EM.Cube]]''', a comprehensive, integrated, modular electromagnetic modeling environment. [[EM.Ferma]] shares the visual interface, 3D parametric CAD modeler, data visualization tools, and many more utilities and features collectively known as [[Building_Geometrical_Constructions_in_CubeCAD | CubeCAD]] with all of [[EM.Cube]]'s other computational modules.
+EM.Ferma is the low-frequency '''Static Module''' of '''[[EM.Cube]]''', a comprehensive, integrated, modular electromagnetic modeling environment. EM.Ferma shares the visual interface, 3D parametric CAD modeler, data visualization tools, and many more utilities and features collectively known as [[Building_Geometrical_Constructions_in_CubeCAD | CubeCAD]] with all of [[EM.Cube]]'s other computational modules.
 [[Image:Info_icon.png|30px]] Click here to learn more about '''[[Getting_Started_with_EM.Cube | EM.Cube Modeling Environment]]'''.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 17 June 2018
Line 18:		Line 18:

	[[Image:Info_icon.png\|30px]] Click here to learn more about the '''[[Electrostatic & Magnetostatic Field Analysis \| Theory of Electrostatic and Magnetostatic Methods]]'''.		[[Image:Info_icon.png\|30px]] Click here to learn more about the '''[[Electrostatic & Magnetostatic Field Analysis \| Theory of Electrostatic and Magnetostatic Methods]]'''.
		+
		+	[[Image:Info_icon.png\|30px]] Click here to learn more about the '''[[Steady-State_Thermal_Analysis \| Theory of Steady-State Heat Transfer Methods]]'''.

	<table>		<table>